Insider Selling

A week ago, my friend, the Perma-Bear introduced me to a new financial term, insider selling.  Insider selling is not to be confused with insider trading, which is a crime.  You can ask Martha Stewart about that.  She might quote Nelson Mandela to you, “many, many good people have gone to prison”, like she did after she was sentenced to prison for lying about her insider trading.  No, insider selling is not a crime, but part of the cure for insider trading.

If you are a company officer, a CEO, CFO, COO, president, VP, director or whatever, you are generally privy to three things:

  • Insider information about your company
  • Company stock as part of your personal incentive compensation plan
  • Regulation on when you can buy and sell your company’s stock

Insider selling is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  Company officers are only allowed to sell or buy their company’s stock within prescribed time periods.  Plus, they must schedule their trades well in advance and finally, all such trades are eventually made public.  All of these measures were designed to limit if not actually eliminate insider trading.

The reason that the Perma-Bear introduced the term, insider selling to me was because he wanted to make another one of his bearish points.  To wit, normally the ratio of selling trades to buying trades is within a range below ten-to-one.  Company officers generally get paid in large part, in company stock, but because you can’t use stock certificates at Walmart, they need to convert them into cash.  This helps to explain the normal preponderance of selling to buying, but not near as well as greed does.

The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. – Gordon Geeko, Wall Street

But I digress; the Perma-Bear’s point was that now the insider selling ratio has ballooned to 1400 to one.  There are currently 1400 more company officer trades that are selling their company’s stocks then buying it.  He went on to explain that this was more proof that our economy was not on the mend, but probably sinking into a double dip recession or worse.  His point, if these company officers truly believed in the near term prosperity of their companies, they would be buying company stock or at least holding on to what they had.

I took in his argument without objection, but then thought about it overnight.  After a week, I am ready to respond.  The Bush tax cuts are scheduled to expire at the end of this year.  There are three possible outcomes:

  • No change, the Bush tax cuts are extended
  • Only tax payers earning less than $250K see their tax cut preserved
  • Congress cannot come to any agreement and all of the tax cuts expire

So with three possible outcomes and two of them leading to a 5% increase in personal income tax for the wealthy and possibly a 5% increase in the capital gains tax too, I find this massive sell off by our corporate elite as simply personal tax finance played out enlarge and not a predictor of future economic times.  I also find navel gazing is better suited to lotus-eaters then to investors.

This post’s picture, backlit lotus leaf, was taken on Anne’s Sunday afternoon bike ride.  She used her iPhone for the picture, arguing against my long-held assertion that the iPhone is no good as a camera.  Maybe it is the eye behind the camera that is more important than the camera in the hand.  Right Anne?

Faster Than a Speeding Bullet

Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound.  Look!  Up in the sky!  It’s a bird.  It’s a plane.

It isn’t Superman folks, but don’t tell any of these self-professed masters of the universe that, they wouldn’t believe you anyway.  This post centers around two of these self-appointed supermen, David and James Barksdale.  James Barksdale made his fortune and name running one of the original internet browser company’s, Netscape.  His son, David Barksdale is CEO of the startup, Spread Networks.  Netscape was once the dominant web browser, but has since subsided into obscurity, but not before James Barksdale got rich.  Spread Networks is now poised to make its economic mark too, in its niche market.

The point is ladies and gentlemen that greed, for lack of a better word, is good

Last month, Spread fired up its network.  Compared to normal network providers the Spread network is somewhat peculiar.  It only connects two cities, Chicago and New York.  Why did they do this?  The speed of light in finite and inviolable and hence the speed of information over a fiber-optic cable is likewise finite and inviolable.  If you can’t run a race any faster, then your only hope of getting to the finish-line faster is to take a shortcut.  Geometry teaches us that the shortest path between two points is a straight line.  This is the path that Spread took.  Normally it costs $200,000 per mile to lay high-speed fiber networks.  It is estimated that Spread paid a premium $300,000 per mile, to chart the course that they did.  Over a route of 800+ miles this equates to almost a billion dollar premium.  Spread Network’s fiber is estimated to be a total of three milliseconds faster than all other networks.  So why pay almost a billion dollars for just three-one-thousands of a second? 

Someone reminded me I once said “Greed is good”.  Now it seems it’s legal.

The answer of course is the phenomenon of high frequency trading, also know as computerized trading.  In the arms race of high frequency trading, a three milliseconds time advantage is an absolute advantage.  Spread Networks is poised to make a lot of money.  None of the investment houses that operate between New York and Chicago can afford not to sign up.  Spread’s network is obviously a smart idea, but is it a good idea?  Does it create real wealth?  I don’t think so.  It makes the Barksdales and their client’s richer, but does not increase the real wealth of our nation .  They are playing a zero sum game.

Bulls make money, bears make money and pigs get slaughtered

Conversely, the Obama administration broke ground this last week on a high-speed rail line between Saint Louis and Chicago.  This rail line is expected to reap a cornucopia of economic and environmental benefits.  This line is slated to cost $3.1B versus the estimated $2.5B that the Spread network cost.  I ask you folks, who is investing most wisely for our country, our federal government or our investment community?  This is not just a rhetorical question, because our country in its economic woes is vulnerable to eclipsing from our economic rivals, Europe, China and Japan.  The high-speed Voodoo securities trading that has become the de jour needs to be curtailed, if not eliminated.  An individual investor stands no chance against these cyber trading demons.

I think that with the two examples that I have laid out here, that the ineffectual, bumbling and costly federal government has come out on top of the private sector.  Putting money into something is better than wasting money on nothing.  Our stock markets are broken.

Yes, it’s Superman – strange visitor from another planet who came to Earth with powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal men. Superman – who can change the course of mighty rivers, bend steel with his bare hands, and who, disguised as Clark Kent, mild-mannered reporter for a great metropolitan newspaper, fights the never-ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way.

Thanks to the PermaBear for this storyline.  The pictures with this post first stress the emergency nature of our current economic situation and second show some tangible production in our backyard. I like to think of the supermen, the Wall Street titans, as the grasshopper upon the pumpkin, claiming all the credit for what lies below it.  I have quoted Michael Douglas’ character Gordon Gekko throughout this post, because he epitomizes the evil that lurks in Wall Street.  Wall Street II also opens today.